Why is the right to vote important in a democratic government quizlet?

Recommended textbook solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

Recommended textbook solutions

American Government

1st EditionGlen Krutz

412 solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

Politics in States and Communities

15th EditionSusan A. MacManus, Thomas R. Dye

177 solutions

Government in America: Elections and Updates Edition

16th EditionGeorge C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, Robert L. Lineberry

269 solutions

Increased use of referendums:
Pro:
Increase levels of participation, education and legitimacy for major important decisions - connecting the public to political life.
Direct democracy: more active and informed popular who participate between elections, greater civic society and a higher turnout. A more representative govt. who have a stronger mandate, allowing them to govern legitimately.
Tool of precision on contested issues, more democratic to ask the people. Representatives were elected on a whole manifesto, there's no way of knowing how people feel about certain issues - don't necessarily back every policy and its wrong to assume they do.

Con:
Not a strong arguments that referendums have higher turnouts then elections, it has historically been lower until 2014-2016, suggesting people only vote on issues they feel very passionate about. Sometimes they get too passionate and this divides society, creating more harm than good. 2016 - a country divided.
Irradicate the province of the professional politicians and draw out and prolong decision making.
May cause voter apathy if we keep asking people to come to the polls, turnout is low enough and it is difficult enough to get them there every 5 years.
Public can lack the specialist education.
Can be a tool of power play, for parties own good by uniting it or gaining support in an election.

Lowering the voting age:
Pro:
No taxation without representation = fairer.
Increase turnout in the long run by starting them young.
Calls for better young people.
Politicians can no longer ignore th eviews of young people.
Democracy is the will of the people = they are people and mature enough with enough responsibility to make these decisions.

con:
Low turnout among 18-24 year olds, consistently at about 40% - although in Scotland referendum 75% of 16/17 year olds turned out.

Compulsory voting:
pro:
Increase turnout and political participation meaning a more legitimate government, they have a greater mandate and are more representative of the true views of the country.
We know it is effective as it is already used in Belgium and Australia, in both places turnout is regularly higher than 90%.
A greater push for education
The representation of minority views: As young peopled don't vote their issues get ignored, meaning in turn that they are even less likely to vote - this disenfranchisement can only be stopped if they turnout in large volumes, then politicians can no longer ignore them. Jeremy Corby 2017 is looking out for young people and 1 million have registered to vote since 2015.

con:
removes freedom from the public who may wish not to vote for whatever reason, just as we have the right to vote we also have a right not to vote. They could want to show their dissatisfaction with the political system or the choice of representatives. Doesn't allow us to know how people really feel - low trunout is a signal we have a problem.
These are rights that are meant to be safeguarded and protected under a liberal democracy.
Results can be seem as artificial, the problem of apathy still exists and its no use getting uneducated people who don't care to vote as they may do so randomly, makes results less reliable.

Introduction of digital democracy such as E-voting and E-petitions:
pro:
Greater and more frequent political connection for uk citizens. E-petitions used more widely is an easy way for people to participate more doesn/t take much effort, can keep constant participation between elections and show a link between the government and the people - a constant dialouge. A more direct and "pure" form of democracy.
Online voting would make it easier, solve the problem of people not getting to polling stations ect or working mums, people with Jobs - increase participation and making it easier for those who are disenfranchised by really simplifying it.
reduce cost and allows them to eb held more frequently, more direct democracy - big advantage.

con:
Subject to hacking and fraud, run the risk of appearing less open and transparent.
illicit and false information can circulate easily.
excludes those who lack technical knowledge IE the elderly.
reducing elections to push button scenarios, like voting in big brother or x factor.

What are three reasons why voting is important to democracy quizlet?

Why are elections so important in a democratic government quizlet?

What is the importance of right to vote Brainly?

Why should you vote quizlet?