Show Recommended textbook solutions
The Language of Composition: Reading, Writing, Rhetoric2nd EditionLawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses 661 solutions
Technical Writing for Success3rd EditionDarlene Smith-Worthington, Sue Jefferson 468 solutions Edge Reading, Writing and Language: Level CDavid W. Moore, Deborah Short, Michael W. Smith 304 solutions
Literature and Composition: Reading, Writing,Thinking1st EditionCarol Jago, Lawrence Scanlon, Renee H. Shea, Robin Dissin Aufses 1,697 solutions Recommended textbook solutionsHuman Resource Management15th EditionJohn David Jackson, Patricia Meglich, Robert Mathis, Sean Valentine 249 solutions Social Psychology10th EditionElliot Aronson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers, Timothy D. Wilson 525 solutions
Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management12th EditionBarry Render, Chuck Munson, Jay Heizer 1,698 solutions
Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations13th EditionJean Phillips, Ricky W. Griffin, Stanley Gully 174 solutions The free-exercise clause of the First Amendment states that the government “shall make no law … prohibiting the free exercise of religion.” Although the text sounds absolute, “no law” does not always mean “no law.” The Supreme Court has had to place some limits on the freedom to practice religion. To take an easy example cited by the Court in one of its landmark “free-exercise” cases (Reynolds v. U.S., 1878), the First Amendment would not protect the practice of human sacrifice even if some religion required it. In other words, while the freedom to believe is absolute, the freedom to act on those beliefs is not. But where may government draw the line on the practice of religion? The courts have struggled with the answer to that question for much of our history. Over time, the Supreme Court developed a test to help judges determine the limits of free exercise. First fully articulated in the 1963 case of Sherbert v. Verner, this test is sometimes referred to as the Sherbert or “compelling interest” test. The test has four parts: two that apply to any person who claims that his freedom of religion has been violated, and two that apply to the government agency accused of violating those rights. For the individual, the court must determine Whether the person has a claim involving a sincere religious belief, and Whether the government action places a substantial burden on the person’s ability to act on that belief. If these two elements are established, then the government must prove That it is acting in furtherance of a “compelling state interest,” and That it has pursued that interest in the manner least restrictive, or least burdensome, to religion. The Supreme Court, however, curtailed the application of the Sherbert test in the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith. In that case, the Court held that a burden on free exercise no longer had to be justified by a compelling state interest if the burden was an unintended result of laws that are generally applicable. After Smith, only laws (or government actions) that (1) were intended to prohibit the free exercise of religion, or (2) violated other constitutional rights, such as freedom of speech, were subject to the compelling-interest test. For example, a state could not pass a law stating that Native Americans are prohibited from using peyote, but it could accomplish the same result by prohibiting the use of peyote by everyone. In the wake of Smith, many religious and civil liberties groups have worked to restore the Sherbert test — or compelling-interest test — through legislation. These efforts have been successful in some states. In other states, the courts have ruled that the compelling-interest test is applicable to religious claims by virtue of the state’s own constitution. In many states, however, the level of protection for free-exercise claims is uncertain. Category:
Freedom of Religion ← FAQ What does the 1st Amendment's free exercise?Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
What are the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause?The Free Exercise Clause recognizes our right to believe and practice our faith, or not, according to the dictates of conscience. And the Establishment Clause bars the government from taking sides in religious disputes or favoring or disfavoring anyone based on religion or belief (or lack thereof).
What is an example of the Free Exercise Clause?The U.S. Supreme Court held that the free-exercise clause permits the state to prohibit sacramental peyote use and the state can thus deny unemployment benefits to persons discharged for such use.
Which of the following statements is true of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment?Which of the following statements is true of the free exercise clause of the First Amendment? It states that the right to practice one's beliefs is absolute and cannot be restricted.
|