The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame will announce the official 2016 nominees on October 6th. Show The big Rock and Roll Hall of Fame news to break earlier this summer was that the Nominating Committee had reduced its size by about a third. It's unclear how this will impact the ballot (perhaps fewer nominees?), but the remaining members now have even more
power than they did before. Future Rock Legends predicts the following fifteen eligible artists will be on the 2016 ballot:
[Predictions posted September 8, 2015] Future Rock Legends forecasts which of today's artists will be the next generation's Rock & Roll Hall of Famers by using a combination of historically predictive criteria, user votes, and nomination patterns. The official nominees are determined by the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Foundation's Nominating Committee. Artists are eligible for the Rock Hall 25 years after releasing their first record (anyone with a record released up through 1990). Future Rock Legends lists eligible artists by first year of eligiblity or alphabetically. You can contact us here and follow us on Twitter here. This site is not affiliated in any way with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum or the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Foundation.
There's been a few threads on Dad Rock, Boomer Rock, Classic Rock, and other related terms. While the definitions vary, there's often a pejorative connotation. Whenever this topic came up, I kept thinking "David Bowie doesn't seem to neatly fit into these categories despite being of a similar generation to many of the acts". And I kept wondering why. Was it just this weird subjective categorization in my head? I know that in Bowie's case, he stayed aware of contemporary artists all the way up to his final album. Whether it be Nine Inch Nails, Arcade Fire, TV On The Radio, Kendrick Lamar, and others. Somehow with Bowie and his collaborations with newer artists, it doesn't feel like "Boomer Artist collaborates with new artists" it just feels like great artists are collaborating because they like each other's music. There's less of a feeling of generation gap imo. Obviously this isn't to say that other acts don't appeal to newer generations. It's just that certain acts feel tied to certain decades and generations. For instance, I think Queen kind of straddles the line in that they're accessible and appealing to later generations, but also still tied to Dad Rock/Classic Rock by reputation (alongside Beatles, Stones, The Who, Zeppelin, Pink Floyd). What do you think makes it so that an act doesn't get categorized as the whole "Dad Rock/Boomer Rock/Classic Rock" ? What group was referred to as the anti Beatles?Let Us Tell You About The Monks, the 'Anti-Beatles' Band That Influenced Jack White and Iggy Pop | Dallas Observer.
Who was responsible for changing the image of the Rolling Stones?The story goes that the band's manager, Andrew Loog Oldham (who had also worked to promote the fab four), realized the potential windfall that could be reaped from changing an image and from controversy and jumped into action.
Who were the Primettes quizlet?Who were the Primettes? The quintessential Motown girl group in the 1960s was the Temptations. Berry Gordy's desire to appeal to white audiences prompted criticism that Motown sold out to white America.
Who was the host of a US variety show on which the Beatles first appeared in 1964?The Beatles made several appearances on The Ed Sullivan Show, including three in February 1964 that were among their first appearances in front of an American audience.
|
Both the kinks and the who represent bands that defy stones-type and beatles-type categorizations.
direito autoral © 2024 cumeu Inc.
