And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

For some years now many posters on the Forum of pothos.org have enquired about the origin of this - perhaps most famous - quote about Alexander the Great.

A handful of websites attribute this quote to the English poet John Milton (1608-1674), but they never mention any specific citation or poem. An extensive text search to verify the attribution to Milton did not produce any results. Although Milton does make some references to Alexander in both Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained, it is never in the same context or in words matching the quote in question.

The origins of this alleged 'Milton' quote have been debated extensively on alt.quotations and on Quoteland.com. This has provided the following information.

  •     W.W. Tarn, in his Alexander The Great II, 262 (1948) says that it does not occur anywhere in ancient writings, not even in the Alexander romances.
  •     Burnam, in Dictionary of Misinformation (1975) cites Plutarch's passage as 'proof' that the story of Alexander's tears upon conquering the world is a myth. It might have been an apocryphal distortion of facts. We know that Alexander did weep on two ocassions (at least).
  •     Segrais, on this subject of a hero's shedding tears, observes that historians commend Alexander for weeping when he read the mighty actions of Achilles; and Julius Caesar is likewise prais'd, when, out of the same noble envy, he wept at the victories of Alexander. See Virgil (19 B.C.), in The Aeneid (translated by John Dryden).
  •     The reference to Caesar weeping after comparing himself with Alexander also appears in Plutarch as: "To which Caesar made answer seriously, 'For my part, I had rather be the first man among these fellows, than the second man in Rome.' It is said that another time, when free from business in Spain, after reading some part of the history of Alexander, he sat a great while very thoughtful, and at last burst out into tears. His friends were surprised, and asked him the reason of it. 'Do you think,' said he, 'I have not just cause to weep, when I consider that Alexander at my age had conquered so many nations, and I have all this time done nothing that is memorable?'"
  •     Another text which mentions the quote is McGuffey's New Fourth Eclectic Reader, Lesson XXXVI (1866). "Alexander lived many hundred years ago. He was king of Macedon, one of the states of Greece. His life was spent in war. He first conquered the other Grecian states, and then Persia, and India, and other countries one by one, till the whole known world was conquered by him. It is said that he wept, because there were no more worlds for him to conquer. He died, at the age of thirty-three, from drinking too much wine. In consequence of his great success in war, he was called Alexander the Great."
  •     Robert Hayman, in Quodlibets Book II, 95 (1628). "Great Alexander wept, and made sad mone, because there was but one world to be wonne.
  •     Samuel Butler, in Hudibras part 1 (1663). "The whole world was not half so wide to Alexander, when he cried because he had but one to subdue, as was a paltry narrow tub to Diogenes."


So for a while it seemed we would never find a definitive answer to the origins of the quote, but there were some more references of interest.

On the 9th of July 2001, on the Forum of pothos.co.uk Tre has suggested Aelian (170-230 A.D.) as possibly the oldest source of the quote. Check Aelian's Historical Miscellany. And finally, on friday 9th of November 2001, on our Forum, Tre reported to have found the most likely source, Plutarch's essay in his Moralia entitled "On Contentment of the Mind". It reads: 'Alexander cried when he heard Anaxarchus talk about the infinite number of worlds in the universe. One of Alexander's friends asked him what was the matter, and he replied: "There are so many worlds, and I have not yet conquered even one."'

The can be found on e-classics, so everyone is invited to check the reference there. It appears that Tre has resolved the mystery once and for all.

Hans Gruber: a keen mind, a good education, a sharp sense of style and some killer ambition combine to make him one of the greatest villains in cinema history. Well, that and Alan Rickman’s sandy growl.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Die Hard is notable for several things: it’s the best Christmas movie ever made (take that, It’s a Wonderful Life); it’s really good; it’s really fun; and it features some stonking dialogue.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

So today we’re going to examine what might be one of the most famous lines in cinema history:

And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.

Sugh a lovely, evocatove quote, suggesting such epic scope, such sweeping breadth. Alexander the Great, greatest Alexander of them all. There he is, toga-clad, Adonis-like hair whipping in a gentle wind as he stands atop a cliff and considers his life’s achievement, and weeps for he has done all a human can do – there is nothing left for him. So classical! So classy!  Of course Hans Gruber would purr those words; he’s a man who understands and appreciates ambition.

So, what’s he actually quoting? Hans-baby claims it’s Plutarch (‘Benefits of a classical education’) but… he might not be right. Let’s investigate!

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

As I’m sure you don’t need to be told, Alexander the Great pretty much conquered everything, back in the day. He was mad successful, good looking, had a great education (was tutored by Aristotle and slept with a copy of The Illiad under his pillow, or so the legend goes – it might even have been a first edition !) All… very much like our own dear Hans.

But did he actually weep when he realized he’d won the great game of life?

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

(cough cough obligatory Buffy gif cough)

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Sorry, Hans.

Well… probably not. The quote that sainted Hans bastardized up there is probably the product of an unholy union between Plutarch and John Calvin – yes, the Protestant Reformation dude (and inspiration for one-half of a famous cartoon duo) – by way of Reader’s Digest  and The Twilight Zone.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Plutarch, who lived a couple of centuries after Alexander, wrote in On the Tranquility of Mind that ‘Alexander wept when he heard Anaxarchus discourse about an infinite number of worlds, and when his friends inquired what ailed him, “Is it not worthy of tears,” he said, “that, when the number of worlds is infinite, we have not yet become lords of a single one?’

Later, Calvin – who lived many centuries after both Plutarch and Alexander – changed the quote up so that, now, Alexander ‘hearing that there were other worlds, wept that he had not yet conquered one.’

You’ll notice that Plutarch and Ol’ Johnny C are saying that Alexander wept because he learned there were more worlds out there* (one wonders which worlds he was looking at, considering the fact that in Alexander’s time, the other planets were believed to be a special kind of wandering star), and he hadn’t even mastered his own yet. It’s kind of a downer, right? Makes Alexander look young, ambitious, and kind of like a cry-baby, all ‘ugh, I want it nooowww.’ It’s not quite the enobling quotation that Hans busts out. So maybe it was Reader’s Digest that changed things around?

The short answer is: I don’t know for certain.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Unfortunately, I can’t follow the Reader’s Digest information to its source because the attribution appears on a Wikiquote page, and then everything else online cites that. But here’s what the Wikiquote page says:

There are no more worlds to conquer!

Statement portrayed as a quotation in a 1927 Reader’s Digest article, this probably derives from traditions about Alexander lamenting at his father Philip‘s victories that there would be no conquests left for him, or that after his conquests in Egypt and Asia there were no worlds left to conquer. [source]

Things to note: the quote is now by Alexander about his father, but much more like the Hans Gruber quote we know and love.

So how’d this mishmash of a quote (that puts its speaker in a rather less than flattering light) wind up being the rousing summation of Hans Gruber’s ambition? Well, there’s another stop we have to make on our journey from Alexander’s tears to Hans Gruber’s mouth: The Twilight Zone.

The 1963 episode of the groundbreaking anthology show, ‘Of Late I Think of Cliffordville‘, is devoted to a single premise: karma is kind of a nasty customer. (Julie Newmar, one of the actresses who played Catwoman on the 1960s Batman tv show, is in ‘Cliffordville’ – it’s well worth watching, as much for  the bad age-makeup and shaky acting as for the quote.)  ‘Cliffordville’ opens with a robber-baron at the end of his life, drunkenly conversing/monologuing with a janitor about ambition, and in this conversation we find the seeds of Hans Gruber’s great qutation:

Feathersmith [rich old guy who will get his come-uppance by the end of the episode]: I’ve got everything there is to get but I’m still hungry.

Hecate [janitor who will also get what he deserves – money and fame – by the end of the episode]: [quoting] ‘He cried because he had no more worlds to conquer.’

Feathersmith: What?

Hecate: That was Alexander the Great. He cried because he had no more worlds to conquer.

Anyway! ‘Cliffordville’ is based on a 1943 short story, ‘Blind Alley’, by Malcolm Jameson. I haven’t read it! So I don’t know whether this scene is there or whether Rod Sterling inserted it into the Twilight Zone episode. What’s important is that, in ‘Cliffordville,’ the quote is worded almost exactly the same way it is in Die Hard, and to mean exactly the same thing: that hollow, disappointed feeling you get when you realize you’ve achieved everything you set out to do. Finish a book, conquer about two million square miles of land, steal a lot of money, whatever.

Either way, it looks like Hans Gruber’s education wasn’t 100% classical.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Sorry, Hans. Don’t worry, we still love you.

And caesar wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer meaning

Is anyone besides me going to get this reference?

* Yes, in this case, ‘worlds’ is fancy-schmancy talk for ‘other countries.’ I just wanted to throw some Ptolemaic astronomy in there for my homeboys.

Who wept because there were no more worlds to conquer?

And Alexander wept, seeing as he had no more worlds to conquer. “Alexander” is, of course, Alexander the Great, king of Macedon in the fourth century BC. A legend in his own time, et cetera, he died in his early thirties, et cetera, having won many battles.

Why did Julius Caesar weep?

One day, while visiting the temple of Hercules in the large Spanish city of Gades, he saw a statue of Alexander there and fell to weeping in front of it, lamenting the fact that he was older than Alexander had been when he ruled over most of the known world, and yet he himself had achieved nothing noteworthy.

Why did Alexander weep?

He cried because there were no more worlds to conquer. And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer.

Did Caesar cry when he saw Alexander the Great?

So, when Caesar read about Alexander's life, he burst into tears. Perhaps the more ambitious of us ought to cry with him. “His friends were surprised, and asked him the reason of it.