AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs Intel i5 9th gen

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs Intel Core i5-1035G1

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U

► remove from comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs Intel i5 9th gen

Der AMD Ryzen 5 4500U ist ein Mobilprozessor für kleine und leichte Notebooks basierend auf die Renoir Generation. Der SoC beinhaltet sechs Zen 2 Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) (ohne SMT/Hyperthreading = 6 Threads) welche mit bis zu 4 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo). Der Chip wird im modernen 7nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und soll laut AMD eine 2x verbesserte Performance pro Watt bieten als die Ryzen 3000 APUs (z.B. den Ryzen 5 3500U Vorgänger).

Im Vergleich zum minimal schnelleren Ryzen 5 4600U, bietet der 4500U kein SMT / Hyperthreading aber einen höheren Basistakt. Dadurch sollte die Prozessor-Performance sehr ähnlich ausfallen.

Der SoC integriert neben den sechs Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 6 Grafikkarte mit 6 CUs und bis zu 1500 MHz Takt, einen Dual-Channel DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-4266 Speicherkontroller und 8 MB Level 3 Cache. Detaillierte Informationen zu den Renoir APUs finden Sie hier auf unserer Architekturseite.

Der TDP ist laut AMD von 10 - 25 Watt konfigurierbar (15 Watt Default). Daher ist der Chip auch für kleine und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

Intel Core i5-1035G1

► remove from comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs Intel i5 9th gen

Der Intel Core i5-1035G1 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Ice-Lake-Architektur basiert und im Q3 2019 wahrscheinlich auf den Markt kommt. Ice Lake wird im modernen 10nm Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neue Sunnycove Microarchitektur für die CPU-Kerne. Damit sollte die CPU-Leistung trotz geringerer Taktraten mit dem alten Core i5-8365U (Whiskey-Lake, 4 Kerne, max 4,1 GHz) mithalten können. Intel spricht von durchschnittlich 18% höherer IPC Leistung die die Taktunterschiede gut machen sollen. Nach aktuellen Informationen taktet die CPU mit nur 1 GHz Basistakt (garantiert) und kann auf bis zu 3,6 GHz mit einem Kern per Turbo hochtakten. 2 Kerne erreichen maximale 3,5 GHz und alle 4 maximal 3,2 GHz per Turbo.

Neu ist die deutlich schnellere Gen 11 basierende Grafikeinheit UHD Graphics G1. Im Core i5-1035G1 ist die schwächste G1 Variante (die stärkeren haben Iris Plus G4 und G7) namens Intel UHD Graphics G1 verbaut, welche 32 der 64 Shader-Cluster bei 300-1.050 MHz bietet. 

Weiters integriert Intel nun eine AI Beschleunigung im Chip und Wifi 6 und Thunderbolt 3 sind teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. Der integrierte DDR4 Speicherkontroller unterstützt Module mit bis zu 3.200 MHz.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt im modernen 10nm Verfahren und soll mit TSMC's 7nm Verfahren mithalten können. Der TDP kann vom Notebookhersteller weiterhin zwischen 7,5 - 25 Watt konfiguriert werden, mit dementsprechend abweichender Leistung (besonders bei längerer Last).

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 4500U

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1035G1

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

min: 424     avg: 445.8     median: 447.5 (51%)     max: 453 Points

min: 382     avg: 419.3     median: 428 (49%)     max: 431 Points

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

min: 1843     avg: 2236     median: 2219 (9%)     max: 2530 Points

min: 1178     avg: 1409     median: 1311 (6%)     max: 1873 Points

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

min: 715     avg: 896     median: 892 (9%)     max: 1007 Points

050100150200250300350400450500 550600650700750800850900950 Tooltip

min: 518     avg: 613     median: 606 (6%)     max: 803 Points

04080120 160200240280320360400 440480520560600640680720760 Tooltip

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit

min: 156     avg: 172.8     median: 174 (53%)     max: 177 Points

min: 144     avg: 164.6     median: 167.5 (51%)     max: 171 Points

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit

min: 10.22     avg: 10.9     median: 10.9 (15%)     max: 11.6 Points

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit

min: 2.02     avg: 2     median: 2 (6%)     max: 2.04 Points

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

min: 5319     avg: 5337     median: 5337 (44%)     max: 5355 Points

min: 6687     avg: 6870     median: 6869.5 (56%)     max: 7052 Points

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

min: 22934     avg: 24156     median: 24155.5 (28%)     max: 25377 Points

min: 17213     avg: 21299     median: 21298.5 (24%)     max: 25384 Points

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

min: 170.4     avg: 171.9     median: 171.9 (2%)     max: 173.4 s

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

min: 5.7     avg: 7.8     median: 8.3 (2%)     max: 9.48 s

WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0

min: 3420     avg: 3493     median: 3493 (20%)     max: 3566 Points

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs

min: 22466     avg: 24384     median: 24101 (15%)     max: 25891 MIPS

min: 13236     avg: 15975     median: 15156 (9%)     max: 20378 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs

min: 4235     avg: 4290     median: 4288 (51%)     max: 4338 MIPS

min: 3739     avg: 4089     median: 4159 (50%)     max: 4318 MIPS

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset

min: 5.86     avg: 6.8     median: 6.9 (15%)     max: 7.33 fps

012345 67891011121314 Tooltip

min: 3.32     avg: 4.4     median: 4.2 (9%)     max: 6.44 fps

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent

min: 0.511     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (0%)     max: 0.541 GB/s

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish

min: 0.865     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.922 GB/s

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES

Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *

min: 533     avg: 603     median: 584 (4%)     max: 748 Seconds

min: 607     avg: 844     median: 863 (6%)     max: 1002 Seconds

R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *

min: 0.614     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (14%)     max: 0.654 sec

min: 0.705     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (16%)     max: 0.769 sec

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

min: 8933     avg: 8934     median: 8933.5 (19%)     max: 8934 Points

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

min: 10     avg: 10.3     median: 10.3 (2%)     max: 10.5 s

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

min: 620     avg: 622     median: 622 (3%)     max: 624 s

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics

min: 7061     avg: 8121     median: 8095 (22%)     max: 8704 Points

min: 5453     avg: 7214     median: 6880 (19%)     max: 8817 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics

min: 61260     avg: 63475     median: 63892 (41%)     max: 65272 Points

min: 43489     avg: 48198     median: 50440 (32%)     max: 50664 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics

min: 57910     avg: 62775     median: 63587.5 (53%)     max: 66013 Points

min: 50941     avg: 51362     median: 51361.5 (43%)     max: 51782 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics

min: 68588     avg: 69178     median: 69062 (58%)     max: 69884 Points

min: 50897     avg: 52961     median: 53092 (45%)     max: 54764 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics

min: 6900     avg: 7494     median: 7616 (19%)     max: 7925 Points

min: 5430     avg: 6846     median: 6878 (17%)     max: 8047 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics

min: 9800     avg: 11318     median: 11477 (21%)     max: 12259 Points

min: 8019     avg: 9970     median: 10188 (19%)     max: 11678 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU

min: 3316     avg: 3759     median: 3734 (19%)     max: 4187 Points

min: 2659     avg: 3321     median: 3282 (16%)     max: 4121 Points

Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core

min: 1082     avg: 1109     median: 1097 (47%)     max: 1220 Points

min: 1142     avg: 1195     median: 1219 (53%)     max: 1240 Points

Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

min: 4352     avg: 4774     median: 4632 (16%)     max: 6234 Points

min: 3337     avg: 3892     median: 3858 (13%)     max: 4372 Points

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core

min: 936     avg: 1090     median: 1136 (51%)     max: 1199 Points

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core

min: 2972     avg: 3566     median: 3505 (11%)     max: 4221 Points

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core

min: 4486     avg: 4624     median: 4624 (48%)     max: 4762 Points

min: 4909     avg: 5125     median: 5183 (54%)     max: 5224 Points

Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

min: 17798     avg: 18561     median: 18561 (21%)     max: 19324 Points

min: 13605     avg: 14977     median: 15042.5 (17%)     max: 16219 Points

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

min: 819     avg: 851     median: 853 (1%)     max: 871 ms

min: 834     avg: 934     median: 913 (1%)     max: 1043 ms

Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *

Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *

Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score

min: 33759     avg: 43608     median: 48506 (50%)     max: 48558 Points

min: 34726     avg: 35438     median: 35437.5 (37%)     max: 36149 Points

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

min: 191     avg: 196.5     median: 197 (52%)     max: 202 Points

min: 173     avg: 183.2     median: 178 (47%)     max: 195 Points

CrossMark - CrossMark Overall

Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 28.8     avg: 42     median: 43 (7%)     max: 53 Watt

05101520253035404550 Tooltip

min: 25.5     avg: 29.6     median: 29.6 (5%)     max: 33.7 Watt

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *

min: 26.8     avg: 37.8     median: 30.7 (6%)     max: 53 Watt

min: 25.4     avg: 28.6     median: 28.6 (6%)     max: 31.7 Watt

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

min: 16.5     avg: 24.7     median: 25.3 (29%)     max: 31.7 Points per Watt

min: 22.1     avg: 23.7     median: 23.7 (27%)     max: 25.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 4500U → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1035G1 → 88% n=42

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

AMD Ryzen 5 4500U vs Intel i5 9th gen
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation


v1.19

log 16. 06:35:40

#0 checking url part for id 11687 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11411 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:14:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.012s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11687 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#9 got single benchmarks 11687 +0.041s ... 0.062s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11411 +0.006s ... 0.068s

#11 got single benchmarks 11411 +0.058s ... 0.126s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.127s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.129s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.13s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.131s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.132s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.059s ... 0.193s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.193s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.193s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.045s ... 0.238s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.238s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.238s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.239s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.247s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.248s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.25s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.251s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.251s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.252s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.254s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.059s ... 0.313s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.06s ... 0.372s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.374s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.376s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.377s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.011s ... 0.388s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.388s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.388s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.388s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.388s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.39s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.392s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.393s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.394s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.395s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.396s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.396s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.396s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.397s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.397s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.397s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.398s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.398s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.398s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.399s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.399s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.399s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.399s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.402s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.404s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.405s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.406s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.407s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.407s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.409s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.411s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.013s ... 0.424s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.425s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.431s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.433s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.437s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.443s

#86 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.45s

#87 return log +0.025s ... 0.475s

Is a i5 9th gen better than Ryzen 5?

The cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X is by far and away the best option and in some tests even massively overclocking the Core i5-9600K failed to better the AMD CPU with the latter even matching the Core i7-8700K in Cinebench - a CPU which has the same number of cores and threads and costs even more than the Core i5-9600K.

Is Ryzen 5 4500U the same as i5?

Today we have two processors that each introduced a new feature for their company. ... Specs table:.

Is Ryzen 5 better then Intel i5?

Regarding raw performance, the AMD Ryzen 5 and the Intel Core i5 are powerful processors. However, the Ryzen 5 has an edge in this department. It has more cores and threads than the i5, which can handle more tasks simultaneously. It also has a higher base clock speed, meaning it can quickly complete those tasks.

Is AMD Ryzen 5 4500U a good processor?

The Ryzen 5 4500U performs well, but Ice Lake is ~15% faster in its G7 graphics configuration with everything unlocked. Still, given the 4500U is a cut down processor, it's a good result, outperforming the MX250.