Free will may not exist, but it's functionally useful to believe it does; if we relied on neuroscience or physical determinism to explain our actions then we wouldn't take responsibility for our actions - crime rates would soar and society would fall apart from philosophy
Even if free will doesn’t exist, it’s functionally useful to believe it does - it allows us to take responsibilities for our actions. from philosophy
What percentage of people believe in free will?
Specifically, the breakdown has 59 percent endorsing the idea that free will exists and 41 percent voting nay.
Do most psychologists believe in free will?
Most psychologists use the concept of free will to express the idea that behavior is not a passive reaction to forces, but that individuals actively respond to internal and external forces.
Which philosopher does not believe in free will?
The 19th-century philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is known as a critic of Judeo-Christian morality and religions in general. One of the arguments he raised against the truthfulness of these doctrines is that they are based upon the concept of free will, which, in his opinion, does not exist.
What is the main problem with our free will?
Logical determinism. The notion that all propositions, whether about the past, present or future, are either true or false. The problem of free will, in this context, is the problem of how choices can be free, given that what one does in the future is already determined as true or false in the present.